Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Barn would have looked all right to lay eyes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 August 2008
AS another former chairman of Kingston Barn Community Association, I can understand that Beryl Ferrers-Guy should be distressed by the condition of Kingston Barn and the events surrounding it.
She played a leading role in bringing Kingston Barn back into use following the demise of Shoreham Arts Workshop, which used the building from the early 1970s until 1981.

Beryl Ferrers-Guy suggests that barn users should have alerted the council t
o obvious signs of deterioration of the building.

This would be fair comment if there were obvious indications that all was not well with the structure.

There certainly weren't any signs that would be noticed by a layman, prior to Adur District Council's discovery of the movement of the wall plate on the south side of the barn.

After closure, one of the members of the community association sponsored a survey of the structure by a firm of specialists in restoration of ancient barns.

As a result of this survey, we now know that some of the timber bases which support the upright part of the main frames had decayed, causing the whole structure to sink and lean southwards.

This movement predated the introduction of partitioning into the building (pre-1985).

Also, a number of beams called aisle ties had been removed, either before or when the heating system was installed (early 1970s).

The report says: "Deprived of its aisle ties, one would expect the frame to become rather flexible and the wall having to carry all the loads on the wall plate."

It was this wall plate and the condition of the wall beneath it which aroused the suspicions of the council that there was a structural problem with the barn.

This led to the closure of the building.

To barn users, there was no obvious change in the look of the building over the years.

But nobody suspected that certain important parts of the structure were missing.

Brian Taylor
Brighton Road
Shoreham-by-Sea


NOTE: All letters must include a name and address which can be withheld by request.

-------------------------------------
Click here to go back to readers' letters.

Where are you? Add your pin to the Herald's international readers' map by clicking here.

Email the Herald: letters@shorehamherald.co.uk




The full article contains 381 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 10:36 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Shoreham
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.