Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Building might be a 'glass' act – but it's out of keeping



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 November 2008
THE Shoreham Society is very concerned about the proposed development at St Mary's Hall, as reported in the Herald last week.
We are happy that the old National School/Town Hall building has been retained within the development, but what is proposed should be totally in sympathy and in scale with its present environment.

The proposed development fails to achieve this
.

Our criticism is not of the building proposed, as such, but of its suitability for this sensitive location in a conservation area.

A great deal of effort has been made over many decades to conserve the very special nature of the delightful churchyard of St. Mary's Church and its immediate surroundings, and it would be a tragedy if this were now destroyed merely by lack of care.

The church is one of the finest of its type in the country and, accordingly, very important.

Alterations to its neighbouring buildings have taken place over more than 900 years, but always in a size and scale that complemented it.

The Shoreham Society is confident that a happy solution can be found that will be in keeping with this context, both in terms of style and scale, but genuine public consultation is a requisite if we are to avoid discontent about what buildings we have to live with long after the developers have disappeared.

The Shoreham Society was able to meet the developers on the site in October and, on October 29, we sent an email to them expressing our views, but we have yet to receive a reply and are, therefore, apprehensive that public wishes may yet again be ignored.

Michael Norman
The Shoreham Society


NOTE: All letters must include a name and address which can be withheld by request.

-------------------------------------
Click here to go back to readers' letters.

Where are you? Add your pin to the Herald's international readers' map by clicking here.

Email the Herald: letters@shorehamherald.co.uk

Want to read this page in French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Urdu or 48 other languages? click here for Google translate.




The full article contains 350 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 November 2008 4:17 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Shoreham
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.